Daily Cannabis Users Showed Little Driving Impairment After Using High-Potency Products
In a driving simulator study with 118 participants using their own cannabis products, occasional users showed increased lane departures but daily users (including those using high-potency concentrates) showed minimal driving changes.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Occasional flower users had a significant increase in lane departures after cannabis use (0.16/min at baseline to 0.47/min 30 minutes post-use). Daily flower and daily concentrate users showed little to no change in lane departures or speed. All cannabis-using groups maintained or slightly decreased speed post-use, while controls slightly increased speed. Overall driving changes were relatively small across all groups.
Key Numbers
118 participants; occasional flower users: lane departures increased from 0.16 to 0.47/min; daily flower and concentrate groups: minimal changes; controls slightly increased speed (53.9 to 54.6 mph); cannabis groups maintained speed; changes were relatively small across all groups
How They Did This
118 participants completed three 20-minute simulated drives: baseline, 30 minutes post-use, and 90 minutes post-use. 89 inhaled their own cannabis products (flower or concentrates) for up to 15 minutes, while 29 controls completed the protocol without using cannabis. Groups were divided by use frequency and product type.
Why This Research Matters
Most cannabis-driving research uses low-potency products that do not reflect what is actually sold in legal markets. This study used participants' own products (including high-potency concentrates) and found that tolerance plays a major role: daily users showed little impairment even with stronger products.
The Bigger Picture
The finding that daily users show minimal driving impairment even with high-potency products complicates impaired-driving policy. It suggests tolerance significantly affects driving risk, meaning a THC blood level that impairs an occasional user may have little effect on a daily user.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Simulated driving may not capture all real-world driving demands, self-selected participants using their own products creates dosing variability, no THC blood levels reported in abstract, within-subjects design but unequal group sizes, controlled environment differs from real driving conditions
Questions This Raises
- ?Should impaired-driving thresholds account for tolerance?
- ?Are the small changes in occasional users enough to increase real-world crash risk?
- ?Would different driving scenarios (emergency braking, complex intersections) reveal larger differences?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Daily cannabis users showed minimal driving impairment even with high-potency concentrates
- Evidence Grade:
- Well-designed within-subjects simulator study with naturalistic product use; moderate size but simulated rather than real driving
- Study Age:
- Published 2025
- Original Title:
- Impact of naturalistic cannabis use on lateral control and speed: A driving simulator study.
- Published In:
- Traffic injury prevention, 26(sup1), S86-S95 (2025)
- Authors:
- Brooks-Russell, Ashley(20), Bird, Sarah(2), Brown, Timothy(7), Limbacher, Sarah, Kosnett, Michael, Dooley, Greg, Wrobel, Julia
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06120
Evidence Hierarchy
Watches what happens naturally without intervening.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Does cannabis impair driving?
It depends on the user. Occasional cannabis users showed increased lane departures in a driving simulator, but daily users (including those using high-potency concentrates) showed minimal changes, consistent with tolerance.
Does using stronger cannabis products mean worse driving?
Not in this study. Daily concentrate users (the highest potency group) showed no significant driving impairment, while occasional flower users (lower potency) had the most lane departures.
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06120APA
Brooks-Russell, Ashley; Bird, Sarah; Brown, Timothy; Limbacher, Sarah; Kosnett, Michael; Dooley, Greg; Wrobel, Julia. (2025). Impact of naturalistic cannabis use on lateral control and speed: A driving simulator study.. Traffic injury prevention, 26(sup1), S86-S95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2508381
MLA
Brooks-Russell, Ashley, et al. "Impact of naturalistic cannabis use on lateral control and speed: A driving simulator study.." Traffic injury prevention, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2508381
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Impact of naturalistic cannabis use on lateral control and s..." RTHC-06120. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/brooks-russell-2025-impact-of-naturalistic-cannabis
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.