What Happens When Countries Regulate Cannabis: Arrests Drop, Adult Use Rises

A systematic review across five jurisdictions found that regulated cannabis supply consistently decreased cannabis arrests and increased adult use, while negative health outcomes were most pronounced in US states.

Belackova, Vendula et al.·The International journal on drug policy·2025·Strong EvidenceSystematic Review
RTHC-06037Systematic ReviewStrong Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Systematic Review
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Across the Netherlands, Spain, US legalization states, Uruguay, and Canada, consistent outcomes included decreased cannabis-related arrests, increased adult (but not adolescent) cannabis use, and increased healthcare utilization (not traffic-related). Negative health outcomes were most concentrated in US states. Evidence was limited for non-US jurisdictions.

Key Numbers

Five jurisdictions compared. Consistent outcomes: decreased arrests, increased adult use (not adolescent), increased non-traffic healthcare utilization. US states showed most negative health outcomes. Other jurisdictions had limited study designs or timeframes.

How They Did This

Three-level systematic literature review assessing nine indicators across three domains (social, cannabis use, health-related) in five jurisdictions with different regulation models. Prioritized quasi-experimental studies and categorized by study design and outcome direction.

Why This Research Matters

With more countries considering cannabis regulation, comparing outcomes across different models helps identify which approaches minimize harms while achieving social benefits like reduced criminalization.

The Bigger Picture

No single regulation model achieves all desired outcomes. The variation in results across jurisdictions suggests that the specific design of cannabis regulation matters significantly for public health outcomes.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Heterogeneity in regulation models makes direct comparison difficult. US states dominate the evidence base. Non-US jurisdictions had fewer rigorous studies and shorter follow-up periods. Could not fully distinguish between regulation model effects and other country-specific factors.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Which specific regulatory features drive the different outcomes?
  • ?Can countries design hybrid models that capture benefits while minimizing harms?
  • ?Why do US states show more negative health outcomes?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Adult use increased across all jurisdictions; adolescent use did not
Evidence Grade:
Strong: systematic review across multiple jurisdictions prioritizing quasi-experimental evidence, though limited by heterogeneity in regulation models and evidence quality
Study Age:
Published in 2025
Original Title:
Getting "The whole picture": A review of international research on the outcomes of regulated cannabis supply.
Published In:
The International journal on drug policy, 142, 104796 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06037

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic ReviewCombines many studies into one answer
This study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Analyzes all available research on a topic using a structured method.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does cannabis legalization increase teen use?

Across all five jurisdictions reviewed (Netherlands, Spain, US, Uruguay, Canada), regulated cannabis supply was associated with increased adult use but not adolescent use. This is one of the more consistent findings across different regulation models.

Which regulation model works best?

No single model emerged as clearly superior. The review found that different models have different trade-offs. The authors suggest jurisdictions may need to mix elements from different approaches to achieve the best balance of benefits and harms.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06037·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06037

APA

Belackova, Vendula; Petruzelka, Benjamin; Cihak, Jakub; Michailidu, Jana; Mravcik, Viktor. (2025). Getting "The whole picture": A review of international research on the outcomes of regulated cannabis supply.. The International journal on drug policy, 142, 104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104796

MLA

Belackova, Vendula, et al. "Getting "The whole picture": A review of international research on the outcomes of regulated cannabis supply.." The International journal on drug policy, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104796

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Getting "The whole picture": A review of international resea..." RTHC-06037. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/belackova-2025-getting-the-whole-picture

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.