rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Removing Cannabis From Drug Screening Criteria Improved Racial Equity in Maternity Care

ObservationalModerate evidence
The takeaway

After a hospital removed cannabis use and limited prenatal care as reasons for drug testing, racial disparities in testing and child protective services reporting nearly disappeared.

Hospital administrators, maternity care providers, health equity researchers, policy makers

Racial disparity in testing eliminated: 4.5% vs 3.6% post-intervention

What the researchers found

Before the intervention, Black patients were screened at more than double the rate of White patients (23.2% vs 11.1%). After removing cannabis as a testing indication and adding clinical decision support, screening rates dropped to 4.5% and 3.6% respectively, eliminating the racial disparity. CPS reporting disparities also resolved.

Why it matters

Black pregnant patients have historically been disproportionately subjected to drug testing and CPS involvement. This study shows that changing which substances trigger screening can substantially reduce racial disparities without missing clinically important substance use.

The numbers in context

9,396 patients total. Pre-intervention: 23.2% of Black vs 11.1% of White patients screened. Post-intervention: 4.5% vs 3.6% (no significant difference). CPS reports: 11.3% vs 5.8% pre-intervention; 4.2% vs 3.5% post-intervention (no significant difference). No change in detection of non-cannabis substance use.

How the study worked

Quality improvement study at a single tertiary care center comparing peripartum urine drug screening and CPS reporting rates before (June 2021-September 2022) and after (October 2022-January 2024) removing isolated cannabis use and limited prenatal care as screening indications, with added clinician decision support.

What this study cannot tell us

Single center in one Midwestern city. Cannot fully separate the effect of removing cannabis indication from the clinical decision support component. Unmeasured confounders may exist.

How to read the evidence

Moderate: large quality improvement study with clear before-after comparison, but single center and unable to isolate individual intervention components

When this study was published

Published in 2025 (JAMA Network Open) using 2021-2024 data

The bigger picture

Cannabis-focused drug testing in maternity settings has been a key driver of racial disparities in CPS involvement. This intervention demonstrates that policy changes can improve equity without compromising patient safety.

Questions still open

  • Would these results replicate at other institutions? How do affected families perceive these policy changes? Are there long-term outcomes for infants born to cannabis-using mothers that this approach might miss?

Common questions

Did removing cannabis from screening criteria lead to missed substance use?
No. The rate of positive tests for non-cannabis, non-prescribed substances did not change significantly (2.5% before vs 2.0% after). The intervention reduced unnecessary testing without reducing detection of clinically relevant substance use.
Why were Black patients tested at higher rates before the change?
Cannabis use and limited prenatal care were among the screening indications. These criteria disproportionately flagged Black patients. Removing them shifted screening to more clinically relevant indicators, which applied more equally across racial groups.

Read the original research

Racial Equity in Urine Drug Screening Policies in Labor and Delivery.

JAMA network open, 8(3), e250908

Citation

Azimi, Vahid; Trammel, Cassandra; Nacke, Lauren; Rubin, Alexandra; Stevenson, Lori; Vaughn, Brittaney; Roper, Stephen M; Zaydman, Mark A; Jackups, Ronald; Riaz, Noor; Schamel, Kim P; Kelly, Jeannie C. (2025). Racial Equity in Urine Drug Screening Policies in Labor and Delivery.. JAMA network open, 8(3), e250908. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0908