Teen Cannabis Use Has Dropped Since 1999 — But Girls Now Use More Than Boys

US adolescent cannabis use peaked in 1999 and has since declined substantially, but a major gender reversal has emerged — girls now report higher rates than boys for the first time.

Amrock, Stephen M et al.·Addictive behaviors·2026·Strong EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-08081Cross SectionalStrong Evidence2026RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Lifetime cannabis use dropped from 47.3% (1999) to 30.1% (2023); recent use from 27.1% to 17.8%; early initiation from 11.5% to 6.5%. In 2023, females surpassed males in lifetime (33.4% vs. 27.0%) and recent use (19.4% vs. 16.4%).

Key Numbers

Lifetime use: 47.3% (1999) → 30.1% (2023); recent use: 27.1% → 17.8%; early initiation: 11.5% → 6.5%; 2023 females: 33.4% lifetime, 19.4% recent vs. males: 27.0%, 16.4%.

How They Did This

Analysis of 1991-2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) data, a biennial nationally representative school-based survey of US high school students, using cross-tabulations and logistic regression.

Why This Research Matters

The historic gender reversal challenges decades of assumptions about male-predominant cannabis use and demands updated prevention approaches that address why girls are now using more.

The Bigger Picture

Despite legalization fears, teen cannabis use has actually trended downward for over two decades — but the emerging gender gap suggests different risk factors are now driving female adolescent use.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Self-reported data subject to social desirability bias; school-based survey misses out-of-school youth; does not capture mode of use (smoking vs. vaping vs. edibles).

Questions This Raises

  • ?What's driving the gender reversal in adolescent cannabis use?
  • ?Is the female increase related to mental health self-medication, changing social norms, or product accessibility?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Over 30 years of nationally representative survey data (YRBS) provides robust trend analysis with large sample sizes.
Study Age:
Published in 2026 with data through 2023, providing the most current long-term adolescent cannabis trend analysis available.
Original Title:
Trends in US adolescent cannabis use, 1991-2023.
Published In:
Addictive behaviors, 176, 108634 (2026)
Database ID:
RTHC-08081

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is teen cannabis use increasing or decreasing?

Despite legalization concerns, teen cannabis use has actually been declining since peaking in 1999. Lifetime use dropped from 47% to 30%, and early initiation was cut nearly in half.

Do boys or girls use more cannabis now?

In a historic reversal, girls now report higher rates of both lifetime (33.4% vs 27.0%) and recent (19.4% vs 16.4%) cannabis use compared to boys, as of 2023.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-08081·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-08081

APA

Amrock, Stephen M; Sajkiewicz, Agata J. (2026). Trends in US adolescent cannabis use, 1991-2023.. Addictive behaviors, 176, 108634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2026.108634

MLA

Amrock, Stephen M, et al. "Trends in US adolescent cannabis use, 1991-2023.." Addictive behaviors, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2026.108634

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Trends in US adolescent cannabis use, 1991-2023." RTHC-08081. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/amrock-2026-trends-in-us-adolescent

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.